Trending Topics

      Next match: LFC v Forest [Premier League] Sat 14th Sep @ 3:00 pm
      Anfield

      Today is the 8th of September and on this date LFC's match record is P24 W9 D6 L9

      LFC Reds Poll

      Q. Fans vote for or against VAR

      Sack VAR
      113 (70.2%)
      Keep VAR
      45 (28%)
      Not bothered.
      3 (1.9%)

      Total Members Voted: 160

      VAR

      Read 268856 times
      0 Members and 6 Guests are viewing this topic.
      Keith Singleton
      • LFC Reds Subscriber
      • ******
      • Started Topic
      • 17,913 posts | 2851 
      • Sir Lewis Hamilton
      Re: VAR
      Reply #2116: Jul 04, 2024 05:36:52 pm
      Wrong.

      Wrong again. Your specialist subject.

      Even in the off season when there's not much going on, I post when there's something to talk about. You don't.

      Which isn’t often. However, you only post when there’s controversy regards VAR and even then you come back with all the negative comments to suit your narratives.  :tosser:
      lfc across the water
      • Needs a Klopp hug...Rafa's Number 1 fan...VAR has no faults Promoter
      • Forum Legend - Fagan
      • *****

      • 3,931 posts | 707 
      Re: VAR
      Reply #2117: Jul 22, 2024 08:55:06 pm
      Wrong again. You just can't help yourself.

      You decided to put up with a miserable time watching football by turning against VAR, as it's never going to change just because you want it to. It's here because referees need it to help them out. What fans or anyone else wants, is irrelevant.
      tezmac
      • LFC Reds Subscriber
      • ******
      • 11,578 posts | 1012 
      • F**k the Sun F**k Murdoch F**k the press and F**k
      Re: VAR
      Reply #2118: Aug 17, 2024 06:10:29 pm
      First day of the full season and VAR at its usual standard, deliberate hand ball and second yellow at Ipswich not given and a a soft penalty at West Ham, and  I have only watched Two games
      « Last Edit: Aug 17, 2024 06:17:48 pm by tezmac »
      __Tickle__
      • Forum Legend - Fagan
      • *****

      • 3,185 posts | 530 
      Re: VAR
      Reply #2119: Aug 17, 2024 06:13:07 pm
      First day of the full season andVAR at its usual standard, deliberate hand ball and second yellow at Ipswich and a a soft penalty at West Ham, and  I have only watched Two games

      They've gone back to the ridiculous high bar that they started out with... which basically means it will barely interfere even when decisions are probably wrong.
      tezmac
      • LFC Reds Subscriber
      • ******
      • 11,578 posts | 1012 
      • F**k the Sun F**k Murdoch F**k the press and F**k
      Re: VAR
      Reply #2120: Aug 17, 2024 06:19:10 pm
      They've gone back to the ridiculous high bar that they started out with... which basically means it will barely interfere even when decisions are probably wrong.

      Exactly VAR are just going to back the ref, so what is the point of them being there
      tezmac
      • LFC Reds Subscriber
      • ******
      • 11,578 posts | 1012 
      • F**k the Sun F**k Murdoch F**k the press and F**k
      Re: VAR
      Reply #2121: Aug 17, 2024 06:20:49 pm
      They also have the auto offside but are not introducing it till Christmas so why do it the midway through a season you can’t make it up
      __Tickle__
      • Forum Legend - Fagan
      • *****

      • 3,185 posts | 530 
      Re: VAR
      Reply #2122: Aug 17, 2024 06:33:36 pm
      They also have the auto offside but are not introducing it till Christmas so why do it the midway through a season you can’t make it up

      Apparently their software wasn't able to be upgraded in time to use it yet :lmao:

      Amateur hour at the PGMOL before a ball has been kicked in anger.
      Lallana in Pyjamas
      • LFC Reds Subscriber
      • ******
      • 14,366 posts | 3756 
      Re: VAR
      Reply #2123: Aug 17, 2024 06:39:09 pm
      First day of the full season and VAR at its usual standard, deliberate hand ball and second yellow at Ipswich not given and a a soft penalty at West Ham, and  I have only watched Two games

      VAR can’t look at second yellow card offences 🙄
      lfc across the water
      • Needs a Klopp hug...Rafa's Number 1 fan...VAR has no faults Promoter
      • Forum Legend - Fagan
      • *****

      • 3,931 posts | 707 
      Re: VAR
      Reply #2124: Aug 19, 2024 03:56:15 pm
      Quote from tezmac
      First day of the full season and VAR at its usual standard, deliberate hand ball and second yellow at Ipswich not given......

      First sentence of the new season, and already something's wrong with it.

      Expect more inaccurate rubbish written about VAR as the season goes on. The usual standard.
      HUYTON RED
      • Forum Legend - Shankly
      • ******

      • 41,028 posts | 8955 
      Re: VAR
      Reply #2125: Aug 22, 2024 06:20:26 pm
      First sentence of the new season, and already something's wrong with it.

      Expect more inaccurate rubbish written about VAR as the season goes on. The usual standard.

      Like the Premier implanting the Uefa model but not having the software until Chrimbo

      But you don't mention that either. Some would say your take on VAR is myopic
      lfc across the water
      • Needs a Klopp hug...Rafa's Number 1 fan...VAR has no faults Promoter
      • Forum Legend - Fagan
      • *****

      • 3,931 posts | 707 
      Re: VAR
      Reply #2126: Aug 22, 2024 08:59:04 pm
      I don't have to mention it because it's yet more rubbish. After the October international break is the current target date. Soon enough.

      Also I don't care when it turns up, as long as the correct decision is made. And that we're not ranting about Sterling "offsides" given at Manchester City again because some nutcase doesn't want VAR ruining his game.
      « Last Edit: Aug 23, 2024 12:44:07 pm by lfc across the water »
      Lallana in Pyjamas
      • LFC Reds Subscriber
      • ******
      • 14,366 posts | 3756 
      Keith Singleton
      • LFC Reds Subscriber
      • ******
      • Started Topic
      • 17,913 posts | 2851 
      • Sir Lewis Hamilton
      Re: VAR
      Reply #2128: Aug 23, 2024 04:45:30 pm
      AlwaysTheKop
      • LFC Reds Subscriber
      • ******
      • 8,762 posts | 1544 
      • CHAMP19NS.
      Re: VAR
      Reply #2129: Aug 23, 2024 05:28:49 pm
      I don't have to mention it because it's yet more rubbish. After the October international break is the current target date. Soon enough.

      Also I don't care when it turns up, as long as the correct decision is made. And that we're not ranting about Sterling "offsides" given at Manchester City again because some nutcase doesn't want VAR ruining his game.

      One problem there... we don't always get the right decisons with VAR... how's that different to just letting a human ref the game? Can you honestly say with a straight face VAR is always correct?
      dunlop liddell shankly
      • 2009 LFC quiz champion (now to be known as "Kate")
      • LFC Reds Subscriber
      • ******
      • 21,484 posts | 3492 
      Re: VAR
      Reply #2130: Aug 23, 2024 06:30:53 pm
      One problem there... we don't always get the right decisons with VAR... how's that different to just letting a human ref the game? Can you honestly say with a straight face VAR is always correct?

      In his defence, he doesn't claim VAR to always be correct.

      He may defend the indefensible but he does admit that VAR isn't 100% accurate just that it's more accurate than human error.
      AlwaysTheKop
      • LFC Reds Subscriber
      • ******
      • 8,762 posts | 1544 
      • CHAMP19NS.
      Re: VAR
      Reply #2131: Aug 23, 2024 09:28:14 pm
      In his defence, he doesn't claim VAR to always be correct.

      He may defend the indefensible but he does admit that VAR isn't 100% accurate just that it's more accurate than human error.

      At what cost though? The games sound has definitely been stripped back since it’s introduction… and if it’s not going to offer perfection I’d rather have the excitement back.
      billythered
      • LFC Reds Subscriber
      • ******
      • 11,121 posts | 5142 
      • From Doubters to Champions of the World
      Re: VAR
      Reply #2132: Aug 23, 2024 09:36:14 pm
      That silly  kunt across the water will say its the right decision.  no red card.  :lmao:



      Not only is that a Red card that is dangerous & violent conduct, it doesn’t matter he got to the ball, it’s the intention, two footed tackle in the air ffs, two seconds later he could have snapped both of that fella’s legs/ankles, he’s virtually jumped on the ball two footed, I’d be retrospectively banning that Cnut for the rest of the season!!

      Disgraceful behaviour!!
      Keith Singleton
      • LFC Reds Subscriber
      • ******
      • Started Topic
      • 17,913 posts | 2851 
      • Sir Lewis Hamilton
      Re: VAR
      Reply #2133: Aug 23, 2024 10:07:04 pm


      Not only is that a Red card that is dangerous & violent conduct, it doesn’t matter he got to the ball, it’s the intention, two footed tackle in the air ffs, two seconds later he could have snapped both of that fella’s legs/ankles, he’s virtually jumped on the ball two footed, I’d be retrospectively banning that Cnut for the rest of the season!!

      Disgraceful behaviour!!

      I’d like to know the reasoning behind no red, yet another comedy of errors by the officials. 🤦‍♂️
      dunlop liddell shankly
      • 2009 LFC quiz champion (now to be known as "Kate")
      • LFC Reds Subscriber
      • ******
      • 21,484 posts | 3492 
      Re: VAR
      Reply #2134: Aug 24, 2024 08:28:08 am
      At what cost though? The games sound has definitely been stripped back since it’s introduction… and if it’s not going to offer perfection I’d rather have the excitement back.

      I’m not in favour of VAR meself mate and would rather see it binned off but that doesn’t look like it’s gonna happen any time in the near future at least. So I try me best not to get het up by it.

      But my original point was regarding the across the water lad, who despite defending VAR to high heavens, and god knows he has to with the amount of stick it rightly gets on this forum, has never said it’s 100% accurate.
      tezmac
      • LFC Reds Subscriber
      • ******
      • 11,578 posts | 1012 
      • F**k the Sun F**k Murdoch F**k the press and F**k
      Re: VAR
      Reply #2135: Aug 25, 2024 03:57:18 pm
      VAR useless again at Bournemouth Jolinton clothlines the Bournemouth goalkeeper yellow card sh*te sh*te sh*te
      shabbadoo
      • Forum Legend - Shankly
      • ******

      • 29,524 posts | 4610 
      Re: VAR
      Reply #2136: Aug 25, 2024 03:59:37 pm
      Bournemouth have been robbed of a goal & Red card against Newcastle..

      Best league in the world but sh*te refs..
      Longy-Shops
      • Forum Legend - Fagan
      • *****

      • 3,742 posts | 904 
      Re: VAR
      Reply #2137: Aug 25, 2024 04:20:24 pm
      Bournemouth: VAR statement: Blah blah blah....they deemed it to be a factual handball...." Deemed it.
      The game is being referee'd twice....it's nonsense it really is.
      lfc across the water
      • Needs a Klopp hug...Rafa's Number 1 fan...VAR has no faults Promoter
      • Forum Legend - Fagan
      • *****

      • 3,931 posts | 707 
      Re: VAR
      Reply #2138: Aug 28, 2024 08:10:39 am
      Quote from dunlop liddell shankly
      I’m not in favour of VAR meself mate and would rather see it binned off but that doesn’t look like it’s gonna happen any time in the near future at least. So I try me best not to get het up by it.

      But my original point was regarding the across the water lad, who despite defending VAR to high heavens,  he has never said it’s 100% accurate.

      It's not going to happen in any future. This is part of match officiating now. After all the noise last season, not a single other club supported the stunt raised by Wolves. Why should they when 96% of refereeing decisions are now correct?

      Quote from Longy-Shops
      Bournemouth: VAR statement: Blah blah blah....they deemed it to be a factual handball...." Deemed it.
      The game is being referee'd twice....it's nonsense it really is.

      What are you bawling about? With the current interpretation of the laws, the ball strikes him clearly on the arm, therefore the VAR decision was correct. You can't give goals scored with the arm, in any league anywhere in the world.

      Good to see though that Robinson spotted it this week, because he didn't spot the intentional handball in our game the  week before, while he was on the pitch. Aside from that, that handball decision kept us clear of both clubs in the table.

      And as a bonus from last weekend, VAR spotted the cheating manc thinking that he conned the officials in their game. Which he did, but not the VAR.

      Quick Reply