Well we didn't, so that's another conspiracy theory about refs completely wrong.
More platitude.
It's made the game worse.
Except it hasn't. Just one half into the new season, and we needed it again to spare us. If justice wasn't done at the time, that team were there for the taking. Totally unfit to play 90 minutes because of inadequate pre season preparations, that showed in the second half. Instead we got the decision and got the point.
I'll ignore the main body of your post as it is just more of your tedious, repetitious and frankly boring diatribes in your pitiful and blinkered defence of the VAR system. As for your admitted inability to understand the phrase " Not fit for purpose" allow me to enlighten you and provide you with an example:
A condom with a hole in it, would be by any stretch (pun intended) not fit for purpose.
It's such a stretch, as to be completely irrelevant. Provide a football related explanation, (VAR is only football related) or else it will still be considered an empty meaningless phrase.
Accusing refs of bias in any form, is as you say, tedious, and boring. It's nothing to do with fact. You admitted last season that accusing refs of bias is a smokescreen or coping mechanism, to explain a negative result. What I will say again is that the manc based refs are not biased against us. Evidence of major decisions from all of them given in our favour, can be provided upon request. They're all on the FIFA list, and you don't get on that list if your integrity is in any way questionable. You may not agree with every decision they make, but they do their job in good faith. They're not on the take, as was sometimes the case with refs in Europe 40 years ago.
You can’t have an opinion if you didn’t see the incident you
Oh no, he couldn't be possibly wrong again, could he?
![Huh? ???](https://www.lfcreds.com/reds/Smileys/newer/huh.gif)
Oh wouldn't you know it, yes he could.
![f_doh :f_doh:](https://www.lfcreds.com/reds/Smileys/newer/f_doh.gif)
I didn't comment about an incident I didn't see, I posted my opinion about the reaction to it, that I did. Another sad page full of the usual lies, accusations, and inaccuracies that I have been correcting here for years, and no doubt will probably still be doing so when I've lost what's left of my hair.
At least you now acknowledge that I wasn't lieing, good. Only about another 19544634625787349 acknowledgements remaining.